WIOA Wednesday: Performance Accountability, Parts 1 & 2
    Author: Luke Murren, Karen Staha, Cheryl Keenan, Melinda Kaufman, Cesar Acevedo, and Jay LeMaster
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This two-part webinar provides stakeholders with a better understanding of the performance accountability provisions in section 116 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the accompanying regulation.
    Publication Year
    2016
    This two-part webinar provides stakeholders with a better understanding of the performance accountability provisions in section 116 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the accompanying regulation. Part 1 reviewed WIOA's performance accountability reporting requirements. Part 2 reviewed state and grantee performance reporting. The presentation (PowerPoint) is available as well as transcripts for Part 1 and Part 2 (MS Word). An outline of both webinars are provided below. PART 1 WIOA Vision
    • The workforce system will be characterized by three critical hallmarks of excellence:
      • The needs of business and workers drive workforce solutions;
      • One-Stop Centers (or American Job Centers) provide excellent customer service to jobseekers and employers and focus on continuous improvement; and
      • The workforce system supports strong regional economies and plays an active role in community and workforce development.
    • Across the system, continuous improvement is supported through evaluation, accountability, identification of best practices, and data driven decision making.
    Themes of WIOA
    • Career Pathways
    • Employer engagement
    • Work-based learning
    • Sector strategies
    • Partnerships
    • Integrated Service Delivery
    • Data Systems
    • Performance measurement
    Performance Accountability Provisions and Reporting Requirements Primary Indicators of Performance
    • Employment Rate 2nd Quarter after Exit (Education/Employment for youth)
    • Employment Rate 4th Quarter after Exit (Education/Employment for youth)
    • Median Earnings in the 2nd Quarter after Exit
    • Credential Attainment Rate
    • 5 Types of Measurable Skills Gains
      • Secondary diploma/equivalent
      • Secondary of post-secondary transcript
      • Educational funding level gain
      • Progress toward milestones
      • Passing technical/occupational knowledge based exam
    • Effectiveness in Serving Employers (states choose 2)
      • Retention with the same employer in the 2nd and 4th quarters after exit
      • Employer Penetration Rate
      • Repeat Business Customer Rate
    PART 2 State and Grantee Performance Reporting
    • Required Reports
    • Reporting Timeframes
      • Quarterly reports are due 45 days after the end of the quarter
      • Annual reports are due October 15
      • The annual and quarterly report templates can be found at ETA Performance Reporting
    • Data Availability
      • Program Year 2017 is the first year of full WIOA data
    • Workforce Integrated Performance System (DOL)
      • Will allow states/grantees to submit an individual record file OR support case management systems
      • Uniform quarterly/annual reports will be automatically generated
    • DOL-Only PIRL
      • States will collect and report data as required by the DOL specific PIRL ETA-9172 (DOL-only PIRL)
    • RSA Data Reporting
    • RSA-911
      • States will collect and report data as required by the RSA-911 (OMB No. 1820-0508)
        • The RSA-911 contains 393 data elements, including the common elements found in the Joint PIRL.
    • AEFLA-NRS
    • Period of Participation
      • Date of Program Entry (PIRL element 900), tracks the Date of Program Entry by requiring the initial service delivery date.
    • Negotiations – WIOA requires 4 elements to be considered during performance level negotiations
      • How the levels involved compare with the adjusted levels of performance established for other states
      • An objective statistical adjustment model
      • The extent to which the levels involved promote continuous improvement
      • The extent to which the levels involved will assist the state in meeting goals established in accordance with the Government Performance and Results Act
    • Statistical Adjustment Model
      • The Departments have developed a fixed effect model to estimate State level performance outcomes.
      • A summary of the model is in Attachment II of TEGL 26-15
    • Sanctions
      • Financial sanctions based on performance failure will be applied to states if, for 2 consecutive years, the state fails to meet:
        • 90 percent of the overall State program score for the same core program;
        • 90 percent of the overall State indicator score for the same primary indicator; or
        • 50 percent of the same indicator score for the same program.
    • Failure to report the WIOA State annual report and/or state ETP report may also lead to financial sanction
    • Determination of sanctions will be “phased in,” based on data availability
    • Performance Guidance Review
    RESOURCES
    Benefits and Uses
    This two-part webinar provides state staff with information on WIOA's performance reporting requirements. Required reports are identified and links provided to downloadable templates. The presenters provide insight into the reporting requirements that will help in report preparation. Users can watch the webinar recording or use the accompanying presentation and transcript to find information quickly.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    State Strategies to Scale Quality Work-Based Learning
    Author: Kimberly Hauge and Brent Parton
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This brief strategies governors can implement to increase opportunities for high-quality, demand-driven work-based learning and prepare their citizens for the modern workforce.
    Publication Year
    2016
    Industries in every state are struggling to find qualified applicants for jobs, while job seekers too often find they lack the skills needed to enter or progress along a career pathway. Preparing a workforce that is poised to meet the needs of businesses and ultimately to make the state more economically competitive is a top priority for many governors. State Strategies to Scale Quality Work-Based Learning highlights strategies governors can implement to increase opportunities for high-quality, demand-driven work-based learning and prepare their citizens for the modern workforce. With the support of their states’ talent pipeline partners, Governors can take a variety of concrete steps to scale high-quality work-based learning experiences:
    • Elevate the state vision for high-quality work- based learning;
    • Implement state-led pilots of high-quality work- based learning programs and plan to evaluate and expand them;
    • Build an infrastructure to support talent pipeline partners’ e orts to scale the programs;
    • Provide incentives for industry to launch and continue sponsoring the programs; and
    • Provide incentives for educational institutions to integrate work-based learning into the education system and support students who participate.
    What the experts say
    This whitepaper from the National Governor’s Association Center is exactly what is needed to bring businesses, workforce centers, educational centers, and adult learners to the same table to create a win-win for citizens and state economies. However, without a strong adult education component embedded into this approach, it will not be successfully sustained. To date, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) has been thorough in bringing adult education to the table. Much of the lasting value for individual adult learners and states’ varied needs can be attained if the ideas in this report are fully implemented. This paper is an excellent source for policy makers to review their work-based learning systems. It’s particularly important due to shifting policies at the federal level, the “skills mismatch” that is besetting many industries, and the silver tsunami facing America with 10,000 baby boomers reaching retirement age daily. It is essential that local adult education centers, community colleges, workforce centers and local governments work together to bring these ideas to fruition if they want their citizens and states to thrive, attract new business, and remain competitive.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    SNAP E&T – Opportunities for Alignment with WIOA
    Author: David Kaz
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, WIOA, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    The brief presents an examination of the initial impact of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) on state SNAP Employment and Training (E&T) programs.
    Author(s)
    David Kaz
    Author(s) Organizational Affiliation
    Seattle Jobs Initiative
    Publication Year
    2016
    Resource Type
    Product
    Number of Pages
    31
    Abstract
    Administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Services (FNS), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Employment and Training (SNAP E&T) is a federal program that supports employment and training activities and related supportive services to help SNAP participants advance to self-sufficiency. The brief presents an examination of the initial impact, if any, on States’ SNAP E&T programs of the passage of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the opportunity it afforded States to develop new plans for their public workforce systems that align programs such as SNAP E&T with WIOA-supported core programs. It reviews State workforce plans that include SNAP E&T as a partner program. It also presents as a case study the approach of Tennessee, a state that has taken important steps to better align its growing SNAP E&T program with WIOA, both at a strategic and an operational level. Finally, the brief discusses the policies relevant to the alignment of WIOA and SNAP E&T as well as suggestions for integrating these programs in a way that is beneficial to the expansion of job-driven SNAP E&T programs.
    What the experts say
    For state or local adult education administrators, this resource adds to the growing body of work on SNAP E&T implementation strategies. The case study of Tennessee’s SNAP E&T program provides the most useful example to date of state adult serving systems developing an ongoing strategy for braiding SNAP E&T funds with education funds.  While the other states profiled in this report offer few details, the Tennessee example names specific roles for state agencies and local providers. Adult education has long served public benefits recipients but often without thought to aligning services or leveraging funding. Recent efforts by multiple states to align SNAP E&T services with education and workforce development services are enhancing services participants receive and building stronger relationships between organizations seeking to support individuals to economic self-sufficiency. The case studies are valuable in their descriptions of the complementary use of SNAP E&T and workforce development. Additionally, the section on moving forward proffers ideas that may better align WIOA and SNAP E&T program services including: planning and coordinating processes involving state human/social services and labor/workforce agencies; deepening partnerships between SNAP E&T and America’s Job Centers cross-referrals, common assessment, and alignment through sharing of data and data systems; expanding third-party partnerships; using career pathways as a framework for alignment; and seeking opportunities to better align through the coordination of non-core programs with WIOA programs (e.g., TANF, SNAP, etc.).
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Integrated Education and Training Policy: 50-STATE SCAN
    Author: Amanda Bergson-Shilcock
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    A survey of all 50 states and the District of Columbia found that eighteen states have adopted at least one form of integrated education and training policy.
    Publication Year
    2016
    Integrated education and training (IET) policies address the challenge of helping individuals who have basic skill gaps to qualify for middle-skill jobs. These policies encourage the adoption of program models that allow people to develop or refresh basic skills such as math, reading, or spoken English while simultaneously training for a in-demand occupation or industry. These policies are organized into three types:
    • Funding. States can provide funding to local IET programs or partnerships through grants or formula funds, using state or federal resources.
    • Program Initiatives. States can authorize the provision of IET via program initiatives that are part of a state adult education and workforce strategy.
    • Program Requirements. States can go beyond merely authorizing IET by actively requiring the provision of IET.
    To assess the extent to which these policies are being implemented, this scan:
    • Reviewed state adult education, community college, and/or workforce board websites;
    • Reviewed relevant sections of state code; and
    • Conducted follow-up calls and emails with key informants to answer questions and confirm findings.
    Key findings are:
    • At least 12 state provide funding for IET.
    • At least 18 states have launched program initiatives using an IET model.
    • No state has established policies requiring IET, although several states have longstanding initiatives that function as de facto requirements.
    What the experts say
    Integrated Education and Training Policy: 50-State Scan is highly relevant to adult education. It is a practical resource that summarizes the how academic skills and job-related training can be combined (integrated) and what the states are doing in this regard. The report consists mostly of easy-to-read diagrams summarizing the accomplishments of each state in integrating instruction. It could be used in a study circle of program developers, state education and training directors, and program administrators. This report is a good overview of the status of Integrated Education and Training Policy as of December 2016. It may be useful for a variety of individuals interested in adult education and the workforce including local leaders who are developing procedures and programs and want to see what other states are providing. Legislators could review this report to understand the status of neighboring and other states for policy development and federal policymakers could consider this information in identifying funding priorities. Certainly, adult education students doing research may have an interest in this report. The map and chart are the most useful features in that both provide information about the states at a glance. Adult education state leaders, program managers, curriculum writers, and professional developers might use this scan to identify states that have adopted IET systems, but they would need to reach out to their counterparts in those states to learn about how those IET programs were/are created, funded, supported, and organized. The descriptions of what is actually happening in the states are brief and do not describe the substance or quality of the programs. This resource would be more useful if it included model programs and provided more detail on the funding, structure, curricula, instructor training, and other components.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Integrated Education and Training: A Career Pathways Policy & Practice
    Author: Judy Mortrude
    Subject Area: IET, LINCS Resources, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Results of a national survey of adult education providers to learn more about Integrated Education and Training (IET) models, funding mechanisms, and partnerships across the country.
    Publication Year
    2017
    Integrated Education and Training (IET) is a research-proven educational practice based in adult learning theory. The Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) and the Texas Workforce Commission conducted a national survey of adult education providers to learn more about IET models, funding mechanisms, and partnerships across the country. Two hundred sixty-five people from 43 states took the survey, which consisted of 31 questions. All results are included in the appendix. Highlighted results from the survey include:
    • Twenty-one percent had not yet started IET programming, while 42% have been doing IET for more than two years. Only 69% feel certain that their program meets all of the IET requirements.
    • The majority of survey respondents are implementing or planning IET with Integrated English Language Civics Education (IELCE), WIOA section 243 funds. Twenty-nine percent offer IET outside of section 243 funds, demonstrating a willingness to provide IET with general funds.
    • Many types of organizations provide the workforce training component: 39% are community and technical colleges, 14% are local workforce one-stop contractors, and 13% are local school districts.
    • Health care occupations dominate IET program offerings—over half of all IET programs reported preparing students for the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) credential.
    • Adult educators are targeting industries in multiple high-demand areas. Fifty-six percent offer IET programs in in-demand industries as defined by local workforce development boards, while 17% get their industry information from community and technical colleges.
    • Forty-one percent of IET programs use state grant funds for the workforce training component, while 37% are designed to utilize federal financial aid.
    • Forth-two percent of respondents didn’t know if their IET program is part of their state’s Eligible Training Provider List (ETPL). WIOA title I Adult and Dislocated Worker funds can be used to fund adult education and literacy services when bundled in an IET model
    What the experts say
    Integrated Education and Training: A Career Pathways Policy and Practice is well designed to promote continuous improvement at various levels in the field. A single provider could use it as study material for staff to compare its offerings with the field at large and assess the extent to which its own programs meet research-based standards such as the “tipping point.” WIOA providers in a region could use the IET publication as its title suggests: to review its career pathways policy and practice for improvement. For example, the resource provides several suggestions and strategies to move away from one-off special funding to regular program funds and describes the relevant WIOA regulations to support that move (see page 9). There is significant value to an analysis of the extent of the field’s adoption of the IET approach. This report will be valuable both to practitioners who are considering adding an IET component to their offerings as well as to those seeking guidance on how to strengthen already existing programs. The format is easy to follow and the language is clear. Since IET is an important component of WIOA, many adult education practitioners will be interested in reviewing the results of this survey. At this juncture, this is a helpful overview document both for programs that are already implementing IET as well as for those who are just getting started.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Integrated Education and Training (IET)
    Author: Mariann Fedele-McLeod, Sudie Whalen, Anestine Hector Mason, and Carolyn McGavock
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This policy brief summarizes Integrated Education and Training (IET), which is a combination of education and job skills training that is used to transition adult learners beyond adult basic education and through a career pathway that can offer them job training and eventual gainful employment.
    Publication Year
    2017
    This brief presents the Integrated Education and Training (IET) model as a way to support adults in gaining the skills needed to enter a career pathway that leads to living wage jobs. IET programs combine adult basic skills education and job skills training to offer adult learners a streamlined opportunity to transition from adult basic education classes to employment and/or postsecondary educational opportunities.  This brief overviews different teaching models for offering an IET (e.g., co-teaching and alternating teaching).  They then delve into a more refined description of each of these teaching models, indicating the benefits and possible drawbacks of each teaching model. The authors also identify key components and considerations when planning, developing, and offering an IET (e.g., data collection to monitor implementation and engage in continuous improvement, funding sources). Embedded in the brief are descriptions of two successful IET programs that offer concrete examples of this model and the resulting student outcomes.  The authors note that delivering an IET may require a larger investment due greater implementation costs; however, higher rates of student outcomes and greater transitions to employment and education may make the investment worthwhile.
    What the experts say
    This CALPRO Brief is what a good brief ought to be: succinct, concise, clear, and helpful for users. It provides a basic overview explaining how the components of Integrated Education and Training (IET) can be delivered concurrently and contextually and builds a case for states and programs to implement integrated education and training.  It is short and easy to read and provides a good starting point for discussions around the benefits of IET and considerations to think about when developing an IET. Specific examples are given to explain different ways occupational skills training and basic skills instruction can be integrated using co-teaching and alternating teaching models. A list of ten possible funding sources for IETs is included. One caution for users – it is dated 2017, which makes it several years out of date.  Users may want to seek current data on, for example, correlations between poverty and academic skill levels.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Career Pathways Checklist
    Author: Daniel S. Eckstein and Dana M. Young
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This checklist is designed as a work aid to help determine the extent to which a newly developed or existing program meets the requirements for career pathways in section (3)(7) of WIOA.
    Publication Year
    2017
    Resource Type
    The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) was enacted on July 22, 2014. WIOA calls for cross-system alignment; education and training that is focused on the needs of high-demand industry sectors and occupations; regional collaboration focused on the skill needs of regional economies; and the establishment of career pathways systems that make it easier for all Americans to attain the skills and credentials needed for family-supporting jobs and careers. Within these systems, career pathways programs offer a clear sequence, or pathway, of education coursework and/or training credentials aligned with employer-validated work readiness standards and competencies. This checklist is designed as a work aid to help determine the extent to which a newly developed or existing program meets the requirements for career pathways in section (3)(7) of WIOA.
    Benefits and Uses
    This checklist is for planners and managers of career pathways programs Financial aid counselors and administrators responsible for administering the Ability to Benefit (AtB) provisions of the Higher Education Act (HEA), that allow a student who does not have a high school diploma (or its recognized equivalent) to be eligible for Title IV, HEA student assistance through one of the AtB alternatives if the student is enrolled in an “eligible career pathway program” that aligns to the statutory requirements in WIOA.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Work-Based Learning: Model Policy Components
    Author: Jennifer Zinth
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This policy brief presents a comprehensive policy approach to providing high-quality work-based learning experiences that prepare participants for postsecondary and workforce success in high-demand occupations.
    Publication Year
    2018
    High-quality, work-based learning opportunities can confer a number of benefits — not only for students, but also for schools, employers, and communities. Because high-quality work-based learning opportunities integrate applicable academic concepts and state standards and evaluate a student’s mastery of key employability skills, students can reap greater benefits from quality work-based learning programs than they can from traditional teen employment opportunities.
    In the absence of state policies providing structures and funding for work-based learning programs, there can be disparities in program access from one district to another. Fewer than one-third of states have adopted policies regarding secondary student work-based learning, according to the National Skills Coalition. As of April 2017, 14 states had policies governing pre-apprenticeships and youth apprenticeship programs for high school students, and 11 states had policies governing other secondary student work-based learning. To ensure wide and equitable access to high-quality work-based learning experiences designed to prepare participants for postsecondary and workforce success in high-demand occupations in their region or state, a comprehensive policy approach should include the following components:
    • Single, clear and statewide definition of various work-based learning experiences.
    • High-quality career awareness and exploration beginning in the elementary and middle grades.
    • Funds to support deployment of all activities at the state, regional, and local levels.
    • Development and dissemination of a state framework for work-based learning.
    • Non-elective graduation credit for approved work-based learning experiences.
    Because all five policy areas are interrelated, these components should be viewed as a comprehensive package of policies for state adoption rather than a menu from which states may choose without compromising program availability or quality.
    What the experts say
    Work-Based Learning Model: Policy Components is an excellent resource for state, regional and local entities looking to outline policy considerations for a work-based learning system that includes adult learners. It is well written, concise, and superiorly organized, making it easy to read and understand. Current and well-sourced information is provided from the work-based learning field covering multiple scenarios that educators might encounter in building a work-based learning program. The combination of content and concrete examples of collaboration across state, local, employer and charitable organizations make it a must have resource for work-based learning planning and implementation.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.