Educational Technology in Corrections
    Author: Michelle Tolbert, Jordan Hudson, and Heather Claussen Erwin
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report describes the current status of educational technology in corrections, existing and emerging approaches to providing such services in facilities, and the successes and challenges of early implementers.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This report is designed to inform federal, state, and local corrections and correctional education administrators as they explore ways to securely and cost-effectively provide advanced technologies in corrections facilities to help strengthen and expand educational and reentry services. It describes the current status of these technologies in corrections, existing and emerging approaches to providing such services in facilities, and the successes and challenges of early implementers. The report concludes with a set of recommendations that align with the U.S. Department of Education’s National Education Technology Plan.
    Benefits and Uses
    The report has implications for adult educators providing instructional services to correctional facilities and who may wish to use advanced technologies to support those services. The report can be used by federal, state, and local corrections and correctional education administrators to make the case for adopting advanced technologies to support correctional education programs. The most useful features of the report are (1) the description of existing approaches for providing advanced technologies in corrections, (2) the state and local examples of early implementers, and (3) the recommendations for adopting educational technology in corrections.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Curbing Adult Student Attrition: Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Author: Raj Chande, Michael Sanders, Oana Borcan, Elizabeth Linos, Sean Robinson, Michael Luca, Xian-Zhi Soon, Netta Barak-Corren, and Elspeth Kirkman
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This field experiment looks at the effectiveness of sending text messages to reduce adult student attrition.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This paper presents evidence from a large‐scale field experiment designed to improve attendance rates by texting motivational messages and organizational reminders to students, with messages drawing on insights from behavioral economics. The intervention has a large effect on attendance rates, and this effect persists for the remainder of our sample period (three consecutive weeks of messaging). To implement this experiment, we partnered with two further education colleges in England, consisting of 1179 adult learners. Both schools offer fully subsidized numeracy and literacy courses for adult learners. The hypothesis, based on the theory that psychological barriers contribute to low attendence and course persistence by school dropouts in basic literacy and numeracy classes, was that text messages sent to a random stratified sample of participants in a treatment group would positively affect attendance and course completion. The intervention text messages were also based on behavioral economics theory: 1) They were sent at a time when the student was likely to be home (Sunday evening), shifting their attention to their upcoming class; 2) They encouraged students to engage with their classmates on facebook, to increase a sense of belonging, and 3) They provided encouraging messages such as "Keep up the hard work." The initial results show that these simple text messages reduce the proportion of students that stop attending by 36% and lead to a 7% increase in average attendance relative to the control group. The effects on attendance rates persist through the three weeks of available data following the initial intervention.  
    What the experts say
    If the promising results of this study can be replicated among adult education programs, retention, which is a common challege in the field, should increase significantly without spending a lot of time and money to implement. This inexpensive experiment (estimated at $5 per student) to improve attendance and basic skills course completion for adult school dropouts shows some impressive positive results. It would not be difficult to replicate this, and it would be possible to do that relatively inexpensively. Also, program managers of adult basic skills programs where a large majority of students have cell phones with text messaging might find it worthwhile to try text messaging students, in the way it was done in this experiment, to see if this positively affects student atttendance and persistence.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Corrections and Reentry: Digital Literacy Acquisition Case Study
    Author: Withers, E., Jacobs, G., Castek, J., Pizzolato, D., Pendell, K., & Reder S.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Examination of digital literacy acquisition learning experiences designed to prepare prisoners for re-entry (a case study) Publication Year
    2015
    This case study examines the experiences of incarcerated adult males enrolled in a component of a re-entry program, Digital Literacy Acquisition, and is a segment of a larger focus on the reentry process for successful reintegration of prisoners into society and life.  This study takes place in the Orleans Parrish Prison (OPP), located in New Orleans, Louisiana and provides insightful information on the role of digital learning relative to rehabilitative efforts of re-entry programs within a correctional facility. The model examined in this case study is one that is self-paced, reinforced, tutor facilitated and offers online support for goal directed, learner specific content that is customizable and shareable across varying programs for use by different facilitators. The intent is for participants to learn the relevance of digital literacy to their lives, confront and overcome their fear of technology, and acquire a strong sense of self-confidence. This study explores a range of relevant topics that are specific to the adult re-entry population such as: The learner experience; Relevance; Moving from fear to confidence; Developing self-efficacy and self-confidence; Empowerment; Changing self-identity and imagining possible futures, as well as, the benefits of mentoring and implications
    Benefits and Uses
    This case study is an insightful resource for Adult Education programs, educators and administrators, as well as for policymakers; community based partners and re-entry professionals.  It provides classic examples of threats that can prohibit, or limit Digital Literacy training programs in a correctional facility, as well as offers practical workable solutions and justifications for ongoing program development. Adult learners who are reintegrating back into society after years of separation offer examples of real and perceived technologically based challenges, barriers and weaknesses related to self-efficacy, workplace skills and soft skills, which are addressed by this study to elicit descriptive examples of a Digital Literacy Acquisition program model that works. The most significant feature for the target audiences is that the model can be adapted and incorporated into a more extensive model that offers wrap around services to facilitate incorporation into a successful re-entry process that can aid in the reduction of recidivism on both national and global levels.  
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    CAST UDL Curriculum Self-Check
    Author: CAST
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This site shows how to incorporate Universal Design for Learning (UDL) into curriculum, as well as learn about UDL and explore resources related to it.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The UDL self-check helps expand teachers expand their teaching strategies to reach all learners. Choose a unit or a lesson that is ineffective for some students and use the UDL Self-Check to help overcome barriers the curriculum (goals, methods, materials, and assessment) may pose for them. Evaluate each curriculum element, think about them, and write self-reflections.
    What the experts say
    A limitation is that the site is primarily focused on school-age populations. It is highly useful to the adult educator who is able to adapt information targeted to K-12 teachers. The site can be used to quickly evaluate a lesson or as an expansive resource for information about, and practical tools for, using UDL. Adult educators can complete each step of the self-check using an existing lesson plan or other instructional material. Using the numerous links on the site, the adult educator could also use the site as a platform for learning a lot more about UDL. The goals/methods/materials/assessment sections and the summary report that follows are useful for analyzing a lesson. The related links provide resources for both understanding why aspects of each of these parts of a lesson are relevant to UDL as well as resources for further information and tips for practice. I think that the Curriculum Self-Check is a good idea.  It would have been more applicable if the suggestions and comments were about adult learners instead of the K-12 focus. Unfortunately, it does not link to the College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development
    Author: Bonnie Elsey, Laura Lanier, and Jessie Stadd
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system. The components under each element are not sequential and may occur in any order. Likewise, multiple partners can engage in the components simultaneously to carry out the mission of the career pathways system. The six elements are:
    1. Build cross-agency partnerships and clarify roles
    2. Identify industry sectors and engage employers
    3. Design education and training programs
    4. Identify funding needs and sources
    5. Align policies and programs
    6. Measure system change and performance
    Benefits and Uses
    This revised Toolkit continues the spirit of the original Career Pathways Toolkit: to provide the workforce system with a framework, resources, and tools for states and local partners to develop, implement, and sustain career pathways systems and programs. This revised Toolkit acknowledges many of the U.S. Department of Labor’s strategic investments to create and sustain a demand-driven employment and training system as part of a larger national effort. This version also maintains the original six key elements framework but reflects substantial gains in knowledge and experience as well as reflects the system’s new guiding legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. The original toolkit was published in 2011.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Building Career Pathways for Adult Learners: An Evaluation of Progress in Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin After Eight Years of Shifting Gears
    Author: Brandon Roberts and Derek Price
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report covers efforts to institutionalize, sustain, and scale Adult Education Bridge Programs in three states: Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Joyce Foundation extended Shifting Gears funding from 2012 – 2014 (referred to as SG 3.0) in Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. These states had committed to expanding adult education bridge programs to increase the number of students transitioning into postsecondary education. Such bridge programs are designed to link and integrate basic academic skills with postsecondary occupational credit-based learning in key industry sectors. These bridge programs typically involve contextualized curriculum and instruction, career development, and enhanced student services and supports. Often they are directly connected with additional postsecondary courses as part of a career pathway that leads to postsecondary credentials and degrees. The Foundation also committed to evaluate the progress of these three states in order to document the expansion of adult education bridge programs and the increased number of participants served. A key aspect of this evaluation was to learn how state systems scale adult education bridges, and to identify key factors that enabled or hindered progress toward scale. This report examines the progress made in each state from 2012 – 2014, and also briefly reviews how the Shifting Gears work influenced the national discourse on increasing skills and credentials for adult learners. The evaluation reached five primary findings: • Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin doubled the total number of their bridge programs from 79 to 196 between SG 2.0 to SG 3.0. This growth includes expanding adult basic education bridge programs to more adult education providers and more community and technical college campuses. • Each state effectively institutionalized its adult education bridge program as an ongoing option to address the educational and skill needs of low-skilled adult learners. Altogether, the number of participants served more than doubled, from 4,000 during SG 2.0 to 10,345 during SG 3.0. • In two of the three states (Minnesota and Wisconsin), important policy changes expanded financial resources available for adult education bridges, and created the foundation for further advancing adult education bridges. These changes included reallocating current resources as well as new state funding dedicated to sustaining the expansion of bridge programs. Minnesota now has an $11.2 million allocated fund for career pathway and bridge programs in the biennium budget and Wisconsin has a $4 million annual fund to support these same program approaches. • Scale was not achieved during this period in terms of serving many or most of the low-skilled adults who might benefit from bridge programs. Altogether during SG 3.0 the three states served less than five percent of the adult learners in need. States grew their programs opportunistically rather than setting intentional goals and strategies around scaling. • The work of Shifting Gears positively influenced the national discourse on workforce development. The goal of helping adult learners increase their skills and earn credentials is now widely embraced in the workforce field and can be found as a core principle in the recently reauthorized federal workforce development legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA). Overall, after eight years of investment, the evaluation concludes that the Shifting Gears initiative made demonstrable progress in three Midwestern states in terms of expanding adult education bridges and serving low-skilled adults effectively. In addition, research conducted by Minnesota and Wisconsin suggests that Bridge program students transitioned to college and earned postsecondary credentials at a higher rate than students in traditional adult basic education programs. Furthermore, the focus on career pathways and aligning state adult basic education, workforce, and community and technical college systems influenced national and local thinking on workforce development across the country. In doing so, Shifting Gears contributed to a better understanding of the importance of addressing the educational and skill needs of low-skilled adults, the strategies and actions necessary to do so, and the challenges in sustaining and scaling efforts to achieve significant impact.
    What the experts say
    Building Career Pathwys for Adult Learners: An Evaluation of Progress in Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin After Eight Years of Shifting Gears has an excellent and extensive list of research studies, data and  documents to support the need for the importance of education, workplace skills and bridge programs in every state. This resource is recommended to be read by all state policy makers in each state to evaluate how or if the Building Career Pathways for Adult Learners program would work in their state. The resource would be a valuable tool in a state planning meeting. This resource is also recommended as a interesting information course on pedagogy in adult education.  It is highly recommended that this resource be part of professional development for all adult education and workforce employees. The experimental research base that went into this study was extensive and thorough because of detailed data recorded over a period of five years in 3 different states.  Each state "tweaked" their implementation of building a "bridge" program that was best suited for their state's culture and workforce population. This is a useful evaluation study on a pressing topic. The methodology is qualitative, which was appropriate for the questions being asked. The study provides rich information that will be useful to adult literacy researchers and practitioners.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Blended Learning for the Adult Education Classroom
    Author: David J. Rosen and Carmine Stewart
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    For those professionals with the desire to implement, or further develop their implementation of blended learning, this guide will serve as a step-by-step road map for choosing and efficiently implementing a blended learning model design that meets their needs and budget.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This guide to blended learning is intended for teachers and administrators of adult basic education (including ESL/ESOL/ELL, adult basic education, adult secondary education, and transition to higher education). It is designed to help teachers and administrators understand how blended learning can enhance learning in their classes, programs, or schools. For those professionals with the desire to implement, or further develop their implementation of blended learning, this guide will serve as a step-by-step road map for choosing and efficiently implementing a blended learning model design that meets their needs and budget. The guide has information and resources for readers who are new to blended learning, have experimented with blended learning and want to further develop or improve their practice, or are blended learning experts. The Appendix includes links to resources for adult basic education teachers, tutors and program administrators who want to try out or expand their use of blended learning.
    What the experts say
    Blended Learning for the Adult Education Classroom is an excellent resource for teachers and administrators looking to incorporate blended learning into a new or established adult education program. This is an excellent resource because it is realistic and has proven to be a way to instruct and learn, Blended Learning allows the student and instructor to modify the curriculum, class time and modalities. Many programs believe that they have to have advanced technology and lots of money to implement blended instruction. This guide, which is unique to the field, makes it easy for anyone to explore the benefits of blended learning. It also provides easily-digested information and guidance on how to immediately implement research-supported practices in blended-learning instruction.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Beginning Alphabetics Tests and Tools
    Author: Marn Frank and Kristin Perry
    Subject Area: ESL/ELL, LINCS Resources, Reading
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Beginning Alphabetics Tests and Tools (BATT) strives to provide a ‘principled’ system for ABE/ESL teachers who want and/or need to develop their students’ knowledge of Roman alphabet letters, English letter-sound patterns, sight or high frequency words, and transfer of those lettersound-word skills to text fluency and comprehension.
    Publication Year
    2015
    Beginning Alphabetics Tests and Tools (BATT) strives to provide a 'principled' system for ABE/ESL teachers who want and/or need to develop their students' knowledge of Roman alphabet letters, English letter-sound patterns, sight or high frequency words, and transfer those letter-sound-word skills to text fluency and comprehension. This resource includes: 1) teacher-friendly tests for determining known and unknown skills, 2) evidence-based reading instructional practices, orders, approaches, and lesson plans for teaching unknown skills, 3) teacher-tested lists of other activities and materials, and 4) time-saving teacher resources. It was also piloted by a group of MN ABE/ESL reading teachers, who contributed their insightful feedback, teacher-tested tools, and testimonials. BATT is closely aligned with four Reading Standards: Foundational Skills (K–5) from the Minnesota Academic Standards (MDE, 2010) and Career and College Readiness Standards for Adult Education (OCTAE, 2013):
    • RF.1. Demonstrate understanding of the organization and basic features of print. (Print Concepts)
    • RF.2. Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes). (Phonological Awareness)
    • RF.3. Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words. (Phonics and Word Recognition)
    • RF.4. Read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension. (Fluency)
     
    What the experts say
    Beginning Alphabetics Tests and Tools offers ABE/ESL instructors a simple but comprehensive toolkit for encouraging adults to develop a strong foundation for reading English well. The activities within support best practices from evidence-based recommendations in literacy instruction and provide instructors with the tools (handouts, plans, resources, tests) to engage beginning readers as they learn to read and, hopefully, enjoy reading! The resource provides a teacher-friendly collection of free, accessible assessment tools for practitioners to use that target alphabetics instruction for beginning readers. In addition, the resource takes a pragmatic approach to phonics instruction, thoughtfully describing and then applying synthetic, analogic, and analytic approaches in ways that make sense for various purposes. Furthermore, the five lesson plans progress developmentally, addressing increasingly higher stages of students’ alphabetics knowledge and providing a picture of the scope of instruction in this area. If used within a balanced approach to literacy instruction and introduced with training (or used by someone with a general knowledge of alphabetics instruction), this resource could be a valuable one for teachers of adults being introduced to literacy. Users are encouraged to read the front matter at the beginning of each section with care since good directions and advice are offered there—and it may be easy to overlook them. Of special note: the authors invite users to adapt the assessment directions as needed, and practitioners may want to do so. For instance, students are usually not told what the test is about until step 6 or 7—after the demonstration of what to do on the test. In general, it would be better to tell them the purpose of test first and then provide the demo, so students know what to attend to in the demo.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.