Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards Webinar
    Author: StandardsWork, Inc.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards Webinar

    This webinar showcases some of the innovations in implementing CCR standards.
    .
    Publication Year
    2015
    The webinar, Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards, was produced by StandardsWork, Inc. as part of the CCR Standards-in-Action (CCR SIA) project, under contract to the U.S. Department of Education (Contract # ED-VAE-13-C-0066).  The CCR SIA project was funded to develop and disseminate professional development and advanced-level supports for implementing CCR standards sustainably and at-scale. Since March 2015, implementation teams from 12 states have been piloting the CCR SIA materials and methods. This webinar, conducted on September 2, 2015, showcases some of the innovations that state teams have embraced in implementing CCR standards in their programs. Six state representatives highlight one noteworthy approach to share with their CCR SIA colleagues. In short presentations, they describe how an innovation has contributed to their state’s implementation efforts and any lessons they have learned. The presentations were followed by Q&A sessions. Susan Pimentel, lead consultant and content developer for the CCR SIA project, facilitated the event. It began with her sharing some findings from a recently published study entitled Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better Ms. Pimentel discusses how educational organizations have been able to successfully institute educational reforms and the potential implications for CCR SIA participants’ strategic planning. At the conclusion of the webinar, she provides an overview of activities planned for the project’s upcoming national workshop. The webinar features the following state presentations:
    • Using E-Learning to Supplement In-Person CCR SIA Trainings Chelsea Stewart, Director, ABE Training and Learning Center, CO
    • Finding Ways to Engage Key Practitioners in the CCR SIA Work Marilyn S. Schmidt, Director for Adult Education and Family Literacy, Curriculum and Instruction, Illinois Community College Board, IL
    • Decentralizing Professional Development to Support CCR Standards Implementation Christine Houck, Professional Development System Advisor, PA
    • Placing a CCR Teacher Trainer in Each Region Megan Dichter, WorkReady Statewide Coordinator and PD Portal Support, ME
    • Integrating CCR Standards Implementation into Existing State Structures Jane Schwerdtfeger, Curriculum Specialist, Adult and Community LearningServicesUnit, MA
    • Integrating CCR Standards Implementation with Other State Initiatives Brad Hasskamp, Adult Education Policy and Operations Specialist, Minnesota Department of Education, MN
    Benefits and Uses
    The state presenters are all adult educators sharing information about how their states are implementing CCR standards. Given these states’ efforts, members of the LINCS community may find value in learning about these implementation strategies with a view to trying some of them in their own programs. The cross-state discussion of different ways of structuring CCR professional development opportunities and the lessons learned may be useful. Another theme which emerged in the discussion was strategies for meeting the needs of part-time teachers and isolated teachers in CCR implementation. The resource could be used by program administrators and state staff as they plan for the implementation of CCR standards in their own programs. The webinar could fuel a discussion of different strategies and approaches to piloting and full scale up of the CCR standards. All of the Webinar discussion is useful to states that are implementing the CCR standards. Adult educators may also wish to access the work of Anthony Birk et al. Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better February 2015, which is discussed by Sue Pimentel in the beginning of the Webinar (PowerPoint slides 4-7).  
    Required Training
    A fundamental awareness of the CCR Standards for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics is recommended.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    How Poverty and Cognitive Biases Can Impact Decisions and Action: Using Research from Behavioral Economics and Psychology to Improve Workforce Development Services
    Author: Matt Helmer
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report explores the latest research around how decision-making and actions are influenced by poverty and outlines research-driven strategies that workforce providers can use to help workers become more self-sufficient.Resource URL
    Publication Year
    2015
    In the workforce field, participants’ choices or behaviors that harm their ability to be successful in school or work are often attributed to a lack of soft skills, motivation, or work ethic. While individual responsibility cannot be ignored, the unique circumstances and context of poverty and other cognitive biases can contribute to an individual’s actions. Behavioral economics and psychology research point toward some interventions that workforce development practitioners can use to address some of the barriers presented by poverty and human biases. These strategies, which may help unleash individuals’ potential and strengths, include the following:
    • Providing decision-making, goal-setting, and planning supports
    • Removing hassles and using channel factors
    • Using reminders
    • Using public and private commitments
    • Using default options or prompted choices
    • Categorizing or grouping choices
    • Providing appropriate anchor or reference points
    • Framing choices around gains and loss
    • Providing early rewards
    • Priming positive identities
    • Using social proof and social influence
    • Providing communications, workshops, or tutorials on the brain and learning
    Other features of the report include:
    • “In Focus” examples provide insight into how some of the strategies have been put into practice
    • a four-step process for testing interventions and strategies
    • recommendations for the workforce development system to consider in light of what is being learned from economics and psychology
    • guidance on what interventions may be appropriate in specific circumstances (Appendix A)
    What the experts say
    How Poverty and Cognitive Biases Can Impact Decisions provides adult educators with tools for handling the frustrating, self-undermining behaviors and counterintuitive decision-making frequently seen among their students. With the greater emphasis on workforce preparation under WIOA, this paper provides practical, immediate advice to instructors who know that simply teaching resume writing and interviewing preparation will not change the underlying behaviors that sabotage student success. Administrators and classroom practitioners could use this resource to design action plans for classroom and counseling use. This publication starts the conversation about prevalent and pervasive internal barriers to success experienced by adult education students and provides strategies for overcoming them. These internal barriers may be more significant and pervasive than external barriers such as transportation and childcare. This particular publication examines poverty, but there are other conditions that may also influence mindset, self-identity, and self-efficacy leading to consistently less than desirable choices and decision-making. It also provides recommendations for workforce development practitioners to reduce conditions of economic scarcity that impact their clients’ choices and actions. No attempt was made to tie the research cited to adult learning theories. Granted, little descriptive or experimental research has been with adult learners and the importance of positive self-identity and perception to motivation is undeniable.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Evaluating Number Sense in Workforce Students
    Author: Dorothea A. Steinke
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    The study sought to determine the percentage of workforce students who may need to strengthen their understanding of the part-whole concept by using the same number line assessment.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The new high school equivalency tests ask adults to perform at a level of critical thinking that they may not have been introduced to in their earlier education. This kind of thinking means that a person is able to look at the details and see the big picture or look at the big picture and pick out the relevant details for a given situation. This kind of thinking requires keeping track of the WHOLE (the main idea) and the PARTS (the details) at the same time, while considering the relationships between them. While part-whole critical thinking is important in all academic areas and in problem-solving on the job, it is especially central to math success. Earlier institution-sponsored research revealed that about 20% of students in community college basic math and pre-algebra programs lacked a sense of part-whole relationships with whole numbers. Using the same tool with a group of 86 workforce students, about 75% placed five whole numbers on an empty number line in a way that indicated lack of part-whole thinking. This concept, needed to understand fraction and percent relationships, carries over as a grasp of the relationship between details and the main idea in factual prose, in critical thinking in job situations, and on the current high school equivalency tests. Assessing learners for their understanding of the part-whole concept allows teachers to help students strengthen either their understanding of the part-whole concept or their applied skills.
    What the experts say
    Adult educators will find this article interesting and, perhaps, be surprised that so many adults are not already sensitive to the requirements of a simple number line (equal spaces between all consecutive numbers). This concept is particularly important in work settings that assume workers’ ability to use measuring devices accurately. The resource clearly describes a task that can be immediately used with learners for formative assessment and also provides samples of student work that can be studied and analyzed by teacher study groups and/or groups of learners in a classroom setting. It will be useful to new and experienced adult educators both for its description of problems in adult students understanding of part/whole concepts as well as for giving instructors a very useful tool for quick, easy, and inexpensive assessment of those concepts. The author also suggests reasons for why students lack these concepts including brains that were not physically ready for processing this information due to young age, toxic stress in childhood (e.g., poverty, emotional and physical abuse) and developmental disabilities or traumatic brain injuries. While the information is nothing new to experienced adult education instructors, the author provides a way to see specific results of childhood stress in a way that will ring true to community college instructors in workplace development programs as well as adult basic education classes. The author asks the reader to check his or her assumptions about learning, to modify their teaching, and always to be aware of the building blocks leading to mathematical understanding.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Educational Technology in Corrections
    Author: Michelle Tolbert, Jordan Hudson, and Heather Claussen Erwin
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report describes the current status of educational technology in corrections, existing and emerging approaches to providing such services in facilities, and the successes and challenges of early implementers.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This report is designed to inform federal, state, and local corrections and correctional education administrators as they explore ways to securely and cost-effectively provide advanced technologies in corrections facilities to help strengthen and expand educational and reentry services. It describes the current status of these technologies in corrections, existing and emerging approaches to providing such services in facilities, and the successes and challenges of early implementers. The report concludes with a set of recommendations that align with the U.S. Department of Education’s National Education Technology Plan.
    Benefits and Uses
    The report has implications for adult educators providing instructional services to correctional facilities and who may wish to use advanced technologies to support those services. The report can be used by federal, state, and local corrections and correctional education administrators to make the case for adopting advanced technologies to support correctional education programs. The most useful features of the report are (1) the description of existing approaches for providing advanced technologies in corrections, (2) the state and local examples of early implementers, and (3) the recommendations for adopting educational technology in corrections.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Curbing Adult Student Attrition: Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Author: Raj Chande, Michael Sanders, Oana Borcan, Elizabeth Linos, Sean Robinson, Michael Luca, Xian-Zhi Soon, Netta Barak-Corren, and Elspeth Kirkman
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This field experiment looks at the effectiveness of sending text messages to reduce adult student attrition.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This paper presents evidence from a large‐scale field experiment designed to improve attendance rates by texting motivational messages and organizational reminders to students, with messages drawing on insights from behavioral economics. The intervention has a large effect on attendance rates, and this effect persists for the remainder of our sample period (three consecutive weeks of messaging). To implement this experiment, we partnered with two further education colleges in England, consisting of 1179 adult learners. Both schools offer fully subsidized numeracy and literacy courses for adult learners. The hypothesis, based on the theory that psychological barriers contribute to low attendence and course persistence by school dropouts in basic literacy and numeracy classes, was that text messages sent to a random stratified sample of participants in a treatment group would positively affect attendance and course completion. The intervention text messages were also based on behavioral economics theory: 1) They were sent at a time when the student was likely to be home (Sunday evening), shifting their attention to their upcoming class; 2) They encouraged students to engage with their classmates on facebook, to increase a sense of belonging, and 3) They provided encouraging messages such as "Keep up the hard work." The initial results show that these simple text messages reduce the proportion of students that stop attending by 36% and lead to a 7% increase in average attendance relative to the control group. The effects on attendance rates persist through the three weeks of available data following the initial intervention.  
    What the experts say
    If the promising results of this study can be replicated among adult education programs, retention, which is a common challege in the field, should increase significantly without spending a lot of time and money to implement. This inexpensive experiment (estimated at $5 per student) to improve attendance and basic skills course completion for adult school dropouts shows some impressive positive results. It would not be difficult to replicate this, and it would be possible to do that relatively inexpensively. Also, program managers of adult basic skills programs where a large majority of students have cell phones with text messaging might find it worthwhile to try text messaging students, in the way it was done in this experiment, to see if this positively affects student atttendance and persistence.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Corrections and Reentry: Digital Literacy Acquisition Case Study
    Author: Withers, E., Jacobs, G., Castek, J., Pizzolato, D., Pendell, K., & Reder S.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Examination of digital literacy acquisition learning experiences designed to prepare prisoners for re-entry (a case study) Publication Year
    2015
    This case study examines the experiences of incarcerated adult males enrolled in a component of a re-entry program, Digital Literacy Acquisition, and is a segment of a larger focus on the reentry process for successful reintegration of prisoners into society and life.  This study takes place in the Orleans Parrish Prison (OPP), located in New Orleans, Louisiana and provides insightful information on the role of digital learning relative to rehabilitative efforts of re-entry programs within a correctional facility. The model examined in this case study is one that is self-paced, reinforced, tutor facilitated and offers online support for goal directed, learner specific content that is customizable and shareable across varying programs for use by different facilitators. The intent is for participants to learn the relevance of digital literacy to their lives, confront and overcome their fear of technology, and acquire a strong sense of self-confidence. This study explores a range of relevant topics that are specific to the adult re-entry population such as: The learner experience; Relevance; Moving from fear to confidence; Developing self-efficacy and self-confidence; Empowerment; Changing self-identity and imagining possible futures, as well as, the benefits of mentoring and implications
    Benefits and Uses
    This case study is an insightful resource for Adult Education programs, educators and administrators, as well as for policymakers; community based partners and re-entry professionals.  It provides classic examples of threats that can prohibit, or limit Digital Literacy training programs in a correctional facility, as well as offers practical workable solutions and justifications for ongoing program development. Adult learners who are reintegrating back into society after years of separation offer examples of real and perceived technologically based challenges, barriers and weaknesses related to self-efficacy, workplace skills and soft skills, which are addressed by this study to elicit descriptive examples of a Digital Literacy Acquisition program model that works. The most significant feature for the target audiences is that the model can be adapted and incorporated into a more extensive model that offers wrap around services to facilitate incorporation into a successful re-entry process that can aid in the reduction of recidivism on both national and global levels.  
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    CAST UDL Curriculum Self-Check
    Author: CAST
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This site shows how to incorporate Universal Design for Learning (UDL) into curriculum, as well as learn about UDL and explore resources related to it.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The UDL self-check helps expand teachers expand their teaching strategies to reach all learners. Choose a unit or a lesson that is ineffective for some students and use the UDL Self-Check to help overcome barriers the curriculum (goals, methods, materials, and assessment) may pose for them. Evaluate each curriculum element, think about them, and write self-reflections.
    What the experts say
    A limitation is that the site is primarily focused on school-age populations. It is highly useful to the adult educator who is able to adapt information targeted to K-12 teachers. The site can be used to quickly evaluate a lesson or as an expansive resource for information about, and practical tools for, using UDL. Adult educators can complete each step of the self-check using an existing lesson plan or other instructional material. Using the numerous links on the site, the adult educator could also use the site as a platform for learning a lot more about UDL. The goals/methods/materials/assessment sections and the summary report that follows are useful for analyzing a lesson. The related links provide resources for both understanding why aspects of each of these parts of a lesson are relevant to UDL as well as resources for further information and tips for practice. I think that the Curriculum Self-Check is a good idea.  It would have been more applicable if the suggestions and comments were about adult learners instead of the K-12 focus. Unfortunately, it does not link to the College and Career Readiness Standards for Adult Education.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development
    Author: Bonnie Elsey, Laura Lanier, and Jessie Stadd
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system. The components under each element are not sequential and may occur in any order. Likewise, multiple partners can engage in the components simultaneously to carry out the mission of the career pathways system. The six elements are:
    1. Build cross-agency partnerships and clarify roles
    2. Identify industry sectors and engage employers
    3. Design education and training programs
    4. Identify funding needs and sources
    5. Align policies and programs
    6. Measure system change and performance
    Benefits and Uses
    This revised Toolkit continues the spirit of the original Career Pathways Toolkit: to provide the workforce system with a framework, resources, and tools for states and local partners to develop, implement, and sustain career pathways systems and programs. This revised Toolkit acknowledges many of the U.S. Department of Labor’s strategic investments to create and sustain a demand-driven employment and training system as part of a larger national effort. This version also maintains the original six key elements framework but reflects substantial gains in knowledge and experience as well as reflects the system’s new guiding legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. The original toolkit was published in 2011.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.