Reentry Education Model Implementation Study: Promoting Reentry Success through Continuity of Educational Opportunities
    Author: Wendy Erisman
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report examines the implementation of the Reentry Education Model at three demonstration sites and identifies key lessons for linking correctional and reentry education programs.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, report examines the implementation of the Reentry Education Model at three demonstration sites—Barton Community College in Great Bend, Kansas; Lancaster Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and Western Technical College in La Crosse, Wisconsin—and identifies key lessons for linking correctional and reentry education programs. It finds that the following factors are most important in enabling those previously incarcerated to continue their education and prepare for living-wage jobs:
    • strong partnerships among education providers and correctional facilities;
    • a focus on transitions into and out of the correctional facility; and
    • educational programs leading to career pathways.
    The implementation study also documented that the Reentry Education Model can be used by both prison-based and jail-based correctional education programs. Because of significant differences between local jails and state prisons, however, especially with respect to length of stay in the correctional facility and where individuals live following release, aspects of the model will operate differently in these two settings.
    Benefits and Uses
    This resource documents the lessons learned from three sites that implemented the Reentry Education Model. Their experiences can help to inform other education providers working with the corrections population. Specifically, the resources describes their experiences with establishing and maintaining strategic partnerships, a sound program infrastructure, evidence-based education services, and transition support.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Mathematics Assessment Project (MAP)
    Author: University of California, Berkeley Shell Center Team at the University of Nottingham, U.K.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    The Mathematics Assessment Project (MAP) provides tools for formative and summative assessment to assess students’ mathematical knowledge and reasoning, helping teachers guide them towards improvement and monitor student progress.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Mathematics Assessment Project (MAP) set out to design and develop well-engineered tools for formative and summative assessment that shine a light on students’ mathematical knowledge and reasoning, helping teachers guide them towards improvement and monitor student progress.  It aims to bring the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in mathematics to life in a way that will help teachers and their students turn their aspirations for achieving them into classroom realities. They exemplify CCSS in explicit down-to-earth performance terms. The project materials were produced as part of a collaborative effort between the University of California, Berkeley and the Shell Center team at the University of Nottingham, with support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The MAP materials are of two complementary kinds:
    1. Summative tests or tasks, whichexemplify the performance targets that the standards imply. The tasks, with the associated guidance, equip teachers to effectively monitor overall progress and the mathematical understanding of their students.
    2. Classroom Challenges are complete lessons that support teachers in formative assessment. They both reveal and develop students’ understanding of key mathematical ideas and applications. These lessons enable teachers and students to monitor in more detail their progress towards the targets of the standards.
    Benefits and Uses
    MAP provides instructors and administrators with excellent resources in implementing and evaluating the College and Career Readiness (CCR) standards in mathematics.  The resource is valuable and well organized and provides very good examples of real-life applications of mathematics. MAP provides teachers and professional developers with honest examples of how mathematics is used in real life.  Built around rich problems or tasks, the Classroom Challenges aim to provide a critical supplement to any curriculum. The lessons are structured as formative assessments and are ideally delivered in small classes or group work classroom settings. Opportunities for interaction with and feedback from the instructor are recommended. The lessons are extensive tasks that provide opportunity for students to demonstrate their thinking, to be involved in some degree of productive struggle, and to be able to show modifications in their solutions based on teacher feedback. The support materials provided to instructors are critical in using the task appropriately with students and in providing feedback and evaluation of students’ work. Student work samples are provided to assist instructors in formulating language or instructional strategies that might assist struggling students. It is possible for instructors to either modify the task or select a subset of questions within a task.  With some careful preplanning, the lessons could be condensed and used in a class that has less time for working with larger problems of this type.  The Professional Development Modules, which help teachers with the pedagogical and mathematical challenges of the lessons, are particularly helpful. The whole site is recommended; the Classroom Challenges are particularly helpful. The lessons have a strong alignment to CCSS and individual lessons are linked to specific content standards and the Standards for Mathematical Practice. The lessons incorporate well-designed formative assessments and provide a wealth of material for instructors. This includes the lesson plan with detailed teacher guidance and a presentation PowerPoint, which includes the task information for students. Though designed for specific grade levels, for the most part, the lessons can be presented to students of all ages. As the lessons are aligned to the CCSS, users can search for lessons aligned to CCR mathematical content standards and specific Standards for Mathematical Practice from the “Common Core State Standards” page http://map.mathshell.org/stds.php Optimizing Security Cameras http://map.mathshell.org/materials/lessons.php?taskid=482&subpage=problemis an example of an exemplary lesson suitable for an adult education classroom.  The lesson involves the placement of security cameras to provide maximum security for a given floor plan of a store. This real-life application problem integrates several content domains and requires strategic thinking and an ability to explain and interpret explanations. The lesson plan includes several student work samples that help teachers understand the goals of the lesson and how it develops the targeted standards. The extensive package of resources connected to this lesson is extremely helpful to teachers.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    KET – The Interview – Workplace Essential Skills
    Author: Kentucky Educational Television — KET
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    These videos from a professional career counselor help with interview skills.
    Publication Year
    2015
    Help students make a great impression at their next job interview with this lesson from KET's Workplace Essential Skills series. This self-paced lesson includes videos from a professional career counselor, interactive practice opportunities to get them thinking about their strategy, and more activities they can try at home on their own.
    Benefits and Uses
    Designed for adults who are looking for a job or want to improve their skills in order to get or keep a better job, Workplace Essential Skills shows students what to expect from the job interview process, what skills and attributes employers look for, and how those skills are put to work in real on-the-job situations.   Users will need to be logged in to the PBS Learning Media site to access the video.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards Webinar
    Author: StandardsWork, Inc.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards Webinar

    This webinar showcases some of the innovations in implementing CCR standards.
    .
    Publication Year
    2015
    The webinar, Innovative State Approaches to Implementing CCR Standards, was produced by StandardsWork, Inc. as part of the CCR Standards-in-Action (CCR SIA) project, under contract to the U.S. Department of Education (Contract # ED-VAE-13-C-0066).  The CCR SIA project was funded to develop and disseminate professional development and advanced-level supports for implementing CCR standards sustainably and at-scale. Since March 2015, implementation teams from 12 states have been piloting the CCR SIA materials and methods. This webinar, conducted on September 2, 2015, showcases some of the innovations that state teams have embraced in implementing CCR standards in their programs. Six state representatives highlight one noteworthy approach to share with their CCR SIA colleagues. In short presentations, they describe how an innovation has contributed to their state’s implementation efforts and any lessons they have learned. The presentations were followed by Q&A sessions. Susan Pimentel, lead consultant and content developer for the CCR SIA project, facilitated the event. It began with her sharing some findings from a recently published study entitled Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better Ms. Pimentel discusses how educational organizations have been able to successfully institute educational reforms and the potential implications for CCR SIA participants’ strategic planning. At the conclusion of the webinar, she provides an overview of activities planned for the project’s upcoming national workshop. The webinar features the following state presentations:
    • Using E-Learning to Supplement In-Person CCR SIA Trainings Chelsea Stewart, Director, ABE Training and Learning Center, CO
    • Finding Ways to Engage Key Practitioners in the CCR SIA Work Marilyn S. Schmidt, Director for Adult Education and Family Literacy, Curriculum and Instruction, Illinois Community College Board, IL
    • Decentralizing Professional Development to Support CCR Standards Implementation Christine Houck, Professional Development System Advisor, PA
    • Placing a CCR Teacher Trainer in Each Region Megan Dichter, WorkReady Statewide Coordinator and PD Portal Support, ME
    • Integrating CCR Standards Implementation into Existing State Structures Jane Schwerdtfeger, Curriculum Specialist, Adult and Community LearningServicesUnit, MA
    • Integrating CCR Standards Implementation with Other State Initiatives Brad Hasskamp, Adult Education Policy and Operations Specialist, Minnesota Department of Education, MN
    Benefits and Uses
    The state presenters are all adult educators sharing information about how their states are implementing CCR standards. Given these states’ efforts, members of the LINCS community may find value in learning about these implementation strategies with a view to trying some of them in their own programs. The cross-state discussion of different ways of structuring CCR professional development opportunities and the lessons learned may be useful. Another theme which emerged in the discussion was strategies for meeting the needs of part-time teachers and isolated teachers in CCR implementation. The resource could be used by program administrators and state staff as they plan for the implementation of CCR standards in their own programs. The webinar could fuel a discussion of different strategies and approaches to piloting and full scale up of the CCR standards. All of the Webinar discussion is useful to states that are implementing the CCR standards. Adult educators may also wish to access the work of Anthony Birk et al. Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better February 2015, which is discussed by Sue Pimentel in the beginning of the Webinar (PowerPoint slides 4-7).  
    Required Training
    A fundamental awareness of the CCR Standards for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics is recommended.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development
    Author: Bonnie Elsey, Laura Lanier, and Jessie Stadd
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Revised Career Pathways Toolkit: A Guide for System Development features Six Key Elements of Career Pathways that help to guide local and state teams through the essential components necessary for developing a comprehensive career pathways system. The components under each element are not sequential and may occur in any order. Likewise, multiple partners can engage in the components simultaneously to carry out the mission of the career pathways system. The six elements are:
    1. Build cross-agency partnerships and clarify roles
    2. Identify industry sectors and engage employers
    3. Design education and training programs
    4. Identify funding needs and sources
    5. Align policies and programs
    6. Measure system change and performance
    Benefits and Uses
    This revised Toolkit continues the spirit of the original Career Pathways Toolkit: to provide the workforce system with a framework, resources, and tools for states and local partners to develop, implement, and sustain career pathways systems and programs. This revised Toolkit acknowledges many of the U.S. Department of Labor’s strategic investments to create and sustain a demand-driven employment and training system as part of a larger national effort. This version also maintains the original six key elements framework but reflects substantial gains in knowledge and experience as well as reflects the system’s new guiding legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. The original toolkit was published in 2011.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Author: Student Achievement Partners
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    Achievethecore.org is a Student Achievement Partners website full of content designed to help educators understand and implement the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and other college and career ready (CCR) standards
    Publication Year
    2015
    Achievethecore.org is a Student Achievement Partners website full of content designed to help educators understand and implement the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and other college and career ready (CCR) standards. Many of the resources are applicable to adult educators and seven resources in particular have been selected. All seven resources help adult educators address CCR standards’ Key Advance One (regular practice with complex text and its academic language), Key Advance 2 (reading, writing, and speaking are grounded in evidence from text), and Key Advance 3 (building knowledge).
    1. Text Complexity Collection: http://achievethecore.org/page/642/text-complexity-collection
    2. Academic Word Finder (AWF): http://achievethecore.org/academic-word-finder
    3. Annotated-Mini Assessments: http://achievethecore.org/dashboard/300/search/1/1/0/1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/page/1035/annotated-mini-assessments-list-pg
    4. Text Set Project: http://achievethecore.org/page/1112/text-set-project-building-knowledge-and-vocabulary
    5. Fluency Packet for the 9-10 Grade Band: http://achievethecore.org/page/1022/fluency-packet-for-the-9-10-grade-band
    Benefits and Uses
    Achieve the Core has a wealth of resources which support College and Career Ready (CCR) standards-based instruction. These specific resources represent a selection of tools and information that are particularly relevant for adult education.
    • Key Advance One: Text complexity collection and Academic Word Finder
    • Key Advances One and Two: Mini-assessments
    • Key Advance Three: Text set project
    • Reading and foundational skills: 9-10th grade fluency packet
    The text complexity collection focuses on measuring and describing the complexity of instructional texts, and meeting the demands of Key Advance One.  It provides all of the tools and resources available to understand and successfully address text complexity. Some of the resources directly refer to K-12 grades, but still hold some value for adult educators. The Academic Word Finder is designed to build the capacity of teachers and students alike to identify, understand, and effectively use academic vocabulary (tier two vocabulary) in complex text. This tool supports teachers and students to use level-appropriate complex texts in their lessons. The mini-assessments showcase sample assessments that illustrate the instructional shifts required by CCR standards for English language arts/literacy. “These mini-assessments are designed for teachers to use either in the classroom, for self-study, or in professional development settings.”  They demonstrate text-dependent questions which require close reading of texts. The text set project is designed to build students’ knowledge through reading a variety of literary and information texts at varying Lexile levels. The supplemental materials provided in each text set, such as the rolling vocabulary journal, glossary, and “learning worth remembering” graphic organizer allow students to compare texts, understand the main idea of text, and find the deeper meaning in words, sentence structure, and phrases. In the 9-10th grade fluency packet, students are tasked with repetitiously reading passages of a similar genre. Students exercise their ability to understand spoken word, decode and employ phonics, and read with accuracy. The vocabulary and checking for understanding at the end of the passage reinforces the idea that students should still be able to comprehend what they have read. The text complexity collection presents resources that provide the background information on why text complexity is important, how to measure and assess complex texts, and how to use them in the classroom. The tools can be used to verify that texts used for instruction are appropriately complex. The primary audience for this resource is teachers who are responsible for providing instruction aligned to CCR standards. The resource would also find an audience with professional developers responsible for teaching instructors how to implement CCR standards. Some adult educators will be familiar with the qualitative and quantitative text complexity tools, for example, those who have used The Instructional Advances in English Language Arts/Literacy online resources. However, these supplemental resources encourage adult educators to dive more deeply into text complexity and all its facets. The Academic Word Finder supports the tools available in the text complexity collection. It is not intended to “replace teacher judgment; rather it helps to support the teacher and identify the most useful academic words” in texts they are teaching. The primary target audience is practicing classroom teachers and those who support classroom instruction in adult education programs. Curriculum developers and publishers may also find this a useful tool for planning purposes. The mini-assessments are designed for teachers to use in the classroom, for self-learning, or in professional development settings. The assessments can be used immediately by adult educators and serve as models for the selection and analysis of complex texts and the development of related assessments.  The assessments offer an opportunity for students to do a close reading in a way that simulates a standardized testing experience. They are also useful for instructors to be able to see how well their students do with CCR standards aligned texts and tasks that are designed as a test simulation. No adaptation of these materials is needed. Some texts, however, may not be appropriate for adult education students. The mini-assessments for grades 6-12 are probably the most relevant for adults. Text sets are designed for teachers who are responsible for providing instruction aligned to CCR standards. Each text set centers on a single topic and includes a variety of sources including books, articles, videos, websites, infographics. The sets include suggested activities which build content knowledge and vocabulary and assess students’ comprehension. The fluency packets work to increase student fluency. The fluency packets can be used as supplemental materials, intervention work, homework assignments, or direct instruction. Each fluency packet includes high-quality texts, a focus on vocabulary, and comprehension questions. The text complexity collection provides a thorough and complete explanation of all aspects of text complexity. The quantitative and qualitative tools for text complexity as well as the research on text complexity are all helpful features of the resource.  The quick reference chart and guide to online complexity tools along with the qualitative scales are all extremely useful. This is a valuable selection of resources because text complexity is such a key component of implementing the CCR standards. The Academic Word Finder (AWF) itself is a very useful instructional tool. After opening a free account, users can upload texts to the AWF which then highlights the most useful academic vocabulary words from a given text. The tool identifies below, at, and above learning level tier two words and includes definitions for various contextual meanings and parts of speech. Learning levels are associated with k-12 grade levels, and adult educators will need to choose the corresponding CCR level. The quantitative assessment tool and AWF, used together, establish the quantitative complexity and corresponding CCR level of a text, and the academic vocabulary below, at, and above the CCR level. The text sets and fluency packets for higher grade levels will be most applicable for adult students.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Application of Lincoln Tech’s Early College HS Program amongst Alternative and Adult Education Programs.
    Author: Nicholaus Sutherland
    Program Level: Adult Basic Education
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    By participating in this webinar, attendees will learn about Lincoln Tech's High School Share model, which is a pay per course model available at each of its 22 Campuses in 10 States. This Program model is currently being applied at the YALE School in New Jersey, where adults engaged in an one year diploma completion program are able to take Skilled Trades Education Courses in HVAC as they earn their diploma. Original webinar date: June 26, 2026 Webinar recording link: https://youtu.be/WO9yK8vZtwQ
    Standards-in-Action: Mathematics Foundational Units to Fulfill the Instructional Shifts
    Author: StandardsWork, Inc.
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    These foundational-level Standards-in-Action (SIA) resources and professional development provide educators with practical knowledge about the key shifts in instruction required to align with college and career readiness (CCR) standards in mathematics.
    Author(s)
    StandardsWork, Inc.
    Author(s) Organizational Affiliation
    StandardsWork, Inc.
    Publication Year
    2016
    Resource Type
    Informational Material
    Abstract
    The College and Career Readiness (CCR) Standards Math Foundational Units 1 – 4 were produced by StandardsWork Inc. as part of the Implementing CCR Standards in Adult Education project, under contract to the U.S. Department of Education (Contract # ED-VAE-13-C-0066). The activities that make up Units 1 – 4 will help participants explore what it means to implement CCR standards for mathematics in adult education. Participants will receive a practical and transferable understanding of the fundamental shifts in instruction embedded in CCR standards—including in your state standards—crucial to preparing adult students to meet the real-world demands of college and careers. At the heart of the instructional shifts is a careful examination of the critical content and processes that fuel mastery in mathematics, including the coherent progression from level to level and pursuing conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application with equal intensity. 
    • Foundational Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels addresses the most critical concepts and skills that students must master to be prepared for college and careers.
    • Foundational Unit 2Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning, concentrates on the concept of coherence and its central role in the CCR standards.
    • Foundational Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor investigates what it means to create a rigorous mathematics curriculum.
    • Foundational Unit 4, Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content, provides techniques to enrich instruction by integrating the eight Standards for Mathematical Practice with content-specific standards.
    Each ready-to-use unit includes a facilitator’s guide, an annotated PowerPoint presentation, and participant materials. While training is not required before using this resource, fundamental awareness of the CCR standards for mathematics is recommended. Experienced SIA trainers are available to provide this training to states and programs. For more information, please email the LINCS Technical Assistance Center at training@lincs.ed.gov.
    Benefits and Uses
    This resource supports state and program efforts to implement adult education content standards aligned with college and career readiness to support rigorous, high-quality instruction. Usage of the Math Foundational Units 1 – 4 will strengthen the capacity of adult educators to implement CCR standards to better prepare adult students for success in college and careers. These activities provide the field with opportunities to dig into the CCR standards and explore what it means to adopt CCR-aligned standards in classrooms and how to do so sustainably. Understanding how CCR standards differ from previous sets of standards—and the necessary shifts or advances they call for—is essential to implementing CCR standards well. Engagement in these four units of activities will enable adult educators to identify the most significant elements of CCR standards for mathematics and to determine how best to integrate them into instruction and curriculum. The goal of Units 1 - 4 is for participants to leave with specific ideas, resources, and actions they can implement immediately. Designed primarily for group use, these units also support independent study. The four units should be worked through sequentially. The units can be facilitated during a single daylong training or multiple trainings over several weeks or months. Each ready-to-use unit contains all the materials required to facilitate these training activities, including a facilitator’s guide, an annotated PowerPoint Presentation, and a packet of participant materials. The participant materials include directions, charts, worksheets, answer keys, and other resource materials that guide the use of each unit. The PowerPoint presentations are a digital aid for presenters/facilitators who lead the mathematics training activities. Notes are provided within the PowerPoint presentations to help you prepare for each session. This information accompanies the information offered in the facilitator guides—including the research base, rationale, advice, and other guidelines—to provide the support and guidance you may require.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.