Tools for Building Employer-Educator Partnerships
    Author: Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Workforce
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This website introduces employers and educators to the value of partnering, presents best practices and success stories, and provides links to evidence-based tools for building and sustaining partnerships and creating career pathways.
    Publication Year
    2015
    Employer-educator partnerships are an effective strategy for integrating educational instruction and workforce development that benefits employers, today's workers, and workers of tomorrow. By working together, employers and educators can help employers meet their workforce need and ensure that adult education and career and technical education are truly job-driven. Employer-educator partnerships can:
    • Increase foundation skills development within the workplace.
    • Foster new skills development and internal job promotion.
    • Provide stepping stones for low-wage, entry-level workers to more productive employment.
    • Link education/training and workforce development to labor market trends and needs.
    This website introduces employers and educators to the value of partnering; describes best practices and success stories; disseminates evidence-based tools for building and sustaining partnerships and creating career pathways.
    Benefits and Uses
    The toolkit is intended to help educators and employers form successful partnerships that will ensure that adult education and career and technical education are truly job-driven. The site presents valuable information in two sections, one tailored for employers and one for educators. Each section includes examples of how partnerships have made a difference as well as links to important resources. Website visitors should be able to adapt the resources for their own use to initiate new partnerships or strengthen existing partnerships.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    The CUNY HSE Curriculum Framework–Science: Matter & Energy
    Author: Rebecca Leece, Eric Appleton, Erna Golden, and Shirley Miller
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Science
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This framework aims to help students learn basic science content knowledge while developing their reading, writing, and analytical skills.
    Publication Year
    2015
    New versions of the high school equivalency (HSE) test place a greater emphasis on content knowledge in basic science concepts than previous versions of the GED. In order to do well, test-takers will have to use background knowledge in conjunction with strategic reading and test-taking skills. This science curriculum map is intended to help students develop foundational content knowledge in concepts in matter and energy that underlie all of the physical sciences. This curriculum is intended to help students learn basic science content knowledge while developing their reading, writing, and analytical skills. The curriculum is intended for use by teachers who don’t have a background in science. We provide background information for each lesson and resources for more information. This curriculum may also be used as a separate introduction to science for students who are transitioning into college to study majors that require science: nursing, dental technician, engineering, radiology, etc. Some of the big ideas explored include:
    • How can science help explain recognizable phenomena in the world?
    • How do we evaluate scientific responses to questions about the observable world? Examples include: What causes lightning? Why do helium balloons float? Where do the beads of water on the outside of a cold drink come from? Why is the ocean salty?
    • What are our common misconceptions about how the world works and how can we straighten them out?
    The subjects that make up and connect the daily lessons are rooted in essential questions. Each lesson is linked to previous lessons through embedded review, so that students build a network of ideas and knowledge. Opportunities for reflection on how each lesson fits into previous understandings (or doesn’t fit and requires a restructuring of understanding) are also built in.
    What the experts say
    This is a very well written science curriculum developed for adult education instructors without science background. The lessons are clear, appropriate, and interesting. Adult education instructors interested in teaching science could pick this up and start planning very easily. This is an excellent model for lesson planning and also an excellent curriculum itself. It has very comprehensive and clear scaffolding for teachers, who are presumed to not have extensive knowledge of scientific concepts. This seems as if would be very non-threatening to those who may feel unprepared to teach science, and provides good support to teach the concepts successfully. One support for teachers is an introduction to each lesson that explains the overall goals for not just the content in the lesson, but also for the ways in which it is meant to encourage student engagement and confidence. There are also very useful notes along the way to help with logistics of implementing the lesson plan and background knowledge to help respond to questions and discussions. There are also resources for learning more about the topics addressed in the curriculum. The style of teaching presented in the resource is very much in keeping with accepted best practices of adult education. The activities are designed to promote a lot of engagement, discussion and interaction of students, and focus on using their own questions and past experience to guide the learning. There is also an emphasis on synthesizing known and recently learned concepts with the new ones being presented along the way. This curriculum is very clear that it is “meant to connect the often abstract study of science with concrete, recognizable phenomena relevant to students’ lives.” And it presents a realistic and important view of what science is. The authors express the “….hope that this curriculum offers a more humane view of the field—that science is just the (often flawed and limited) current understanding of how things work in our world.”
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Teaching Analogy Phonics
    Author: Marn Frank
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Literacy
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This resource can be used for teaching English letter-sound patterns or phonics.Resource URL
    Publication Year
    2015
    This resource is designed to equip ABE/ESL reading teachers with (1) an explanation of why anaology phonics instruction is recommended and (2) a "toolkit" that includes lesson plans, instructions, models, a variety of engaging student handouts for use in the classroom,  and lists of word family relatives for ready access in designing analogy instruction. There are three evidence-based or proven approaches for teaching English letter-sound patterns or phonics to children and adults: synthetic (combining different patterns), analytic (separating into patterns), and analogy (comparing similar patterns). Synthetic is most common and used in many published instructional materials. Analytic is less common but can be a valuable practice activity. Analogy dates back to colonial times and teaches reliable and decodable “chunks,” which can be generalized to many other words. This alphabetics resource provides reading teachers and tutors with convincing background information and testimonials, a lesson plan model and template, other reinforcement ideas, and many (over 100!) common or sequential phonogram and word family lists for immediate analogy phonics instruction. It has great potential for ABE and ESL readers - if basic oral language and Roman alphabet skills are present.
    What the experts say
    This is an easy-to-follow lesson plan guide for teaching analogy phonics. The resource provides a brief rationale for using analogy phonics followed by short, explicit lesson plans and word lists. This can be a valuable instructional guide for ABE and ELL teachers and tutors. This a very simple instructional resource, with a basic description of how Analogy Phonics works, followed by very easy to replicate lesson plans, which are supported by student and teacher handouts designed for immendiate application.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Tasks from youcubed
    Author: http://preview.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/factsh/english-literacy-education.pdf
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    The main goal of the project, “is to inspire, educate and empower teachers of mathematics, transforming the latest research on math learning into accessible and practical forms.” The site provides research-based methods, tasks, videos, and ideas which aim to inspire teachers and empower students.
    Publication Year
    2015
    Youcubed is a project of Stanford University, Graduate School of Education. The main goal of the project, “is to inspire, educate and empower teachers of mathematics, transforming the latest research on math learning into accessible and practical forms.” The site provides research-based methods, tasks, videos, and ideas which aim to inspire teachers and empower students. The youcubed tasks have been gathered from a variety of highly reputable sources including mathematics teachers, publishers, and curriculum writers from organizations such as the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Each discrete instructional task is tagged by--
    • Mathematical concept(s) which includes: space and shape, pattern recognition, generalization, modeling, shapes and space, and number sense
    • Mathematical topic(s) which includes algebra, surface area, counting, and ratios
    • K-12 grade level
    • Standards for Mathematical Practice(s) 1-8
    It is possible to search for tasks that relate to any of these variables. Each task includes full instructions, handouts where appropriate, and a task discussion option.
    Benefits and Uses
    The tasks are interesting and engaging and connected to the Standards for Mathematical Practice. While focused at K-12, the tasks are, for the most part, applicable to adult education classrooms. Some tasks may require adaptations for the adult audience. The tasks are reliable, free tools for instructors to use in overcoming several barriers to learning mathematics that adult students may bring with them to the classroom. These include mathematics anxiety, low self-efficacy in mathematics ability, learning limitations that come with aging, and fixed mindset beliefs. The tasks complement a traditional mathematics curriculum. The actual tasks are intended to be engaging activities that require students to actively participate and work together. In the activities, students are actively involved in trying to score points, win a challenge, or accomplish a larger goal. They involve finding patterns, or attempting a strategy, or developing reasoning to solve a problem. The tasks use the common notation (for example, “MP.2”) to link to the Mathematical Practices employed in a task although it is not always made clear how the task accomplishes this connection to the identified standards. Each task also has a discussion group link which can be used to pose questions or raise issues in connection to the individual tasks. The tasks contain all of the information that is required to complete a task including an opening page that provides directions for starting the task, additional resources that help implement the task and handouts where appropriate. Teachers are able to use the search options described in the abstract above to choose the tasks that are most appropriate for their students.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Solve a Teaching Problem
    Author: Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This interactive tool helps instructors diagnose classroom problems, think about possible causes, and explore solutions.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The Solve a Teaching Problem website walks users through a three-step process to identify strategies to address instructional problems in higher education. The strategies reflect sound learning principles and research. Step 1: Identify a problem you encounter in your teaching. Users select a problem from a menu of problems under six categories:
    • Attitudes & Motivation
    • Prerequisite Knowledge & Preparedness
    • Critical Thinking & Applying Knowledge
    • Group Skills & Dynamics
    • Classroom Behavior & Etiquette
    • Grading & Assessment
    Step 2: Identify possible reasons for the problem. Possible reasons for the problem are presented. For example, some of the reasons identified for why students don’t participate in class discussion are:
    • Students’ individual styles or personalities may inhibit their participation.
    • Students’ cultural values and norms may inhibit their participation.
    • Students may not have experience participating in discussions.
    • The physical environment is not conducive to discussion.
    Step 3: Explore strategies to address the problem. Strategies are provided for instructors to consider. For the problem of individual styles or personalities inhibit participation, short descriptions are provided for the following strategies:
    • Help students to prepare in advance.
    • Involve all students.
    • Use groups.
    • Reward participation.
    What the experts say
    This is such an interesting resource that targets discrete teaching/learning problems. While on the surface it appears to primarily for teaching/learning in postsecondary education, it addresses a wide range of problems that vex most adult educators: students who come late to class; students who don’t seek help when they need it; teaching in classrooms where there is wide variation in knowledge and skills; designing group work that really works; understanding why tests may be too hard for students, and on and on. Along with short statements and paragraphs that help frame problems and solution strategies are links to sample activities, examples of student work, original research papers, student success brochures throughout the website. This resource is a practical, how-to guide for college instructors. It could be a stimulus to useful conversation about student needs and instructor strategies to meet those needs, in a professional development context such as a study circle. Although it focuses on college, much of it would be relevant to the needs of adult education students.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Reentry Education Model Implementation Study: Promoting Reentry Success through Continuity of Educational Opportunities
    Author: Wendy Erisman
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This report examines the implementation of the Reentry Education Model at three demonstration sites and identifies key lessons for linking correctional and reentry education programs.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This U.S. Department of Education, Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education, report examines the implementation of the Reentry Education Model at three demonstration sites—Barton Community College in Great Bend, Kansas; Lancaster Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13 in Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and Western Technical College in La Crosse, Wisconsin—and identifies key lessons for linking correctional and reentry education programs. It finds that the following factors are most important in enabling those previously incarcerated to continue their education and prepare for living-wage jobs:
    • strong partnerships among education providers and correctional facilities;
    • a focus on transitions into and out of the correctional facility; and
    • educational programs leading to career pathways.
    The implementation study also documented that the Reentry Education Model can be used by both prison-based and jail-based correctional education programs. Because of significant differences between local jails and state prisons, however, especially with respect to length of stay in the correctional facility and where individuals live following release, aspects of the model will operate differently in these two settings.
    Benefits and Uses
    This resource documents the lessons learned from three sites that implemented the Reentry Education Model. Their experiences can help to inform other education providers working with the corrections population. Specifically, the resources describes their experiences with establishing and maintaining strategic partnerships, a sound program infrastructure, evidence-based education services, and transition support.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science Education
    Author: Linda Kober
    Subject Area: LINCS Resources, Science
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This meta-analysis review from the field of discipline-based education research contains insights on how students learn science and engineering and how to design instructional strategies that build on these insights.
    Publication Year
    2015
    The undergraduate years are a turning point in producing scientifically literate citizens and future scientists and engineers. Evidence from research about how students learn science and engineering shows that teaching strategies that motivate and engage students will improve their learning. So how do students best learn science and engineering? Are there ways of thinking that hinder or help their learning process? Which teaching strategies are most effective in developing their knowledge and skills? And how can practitioners apply these strategies to their own courses or suggest new approaches within their departments or institutions? Reaching Students strives to answer these questions. Reaching Students presents the best thinking to date on teaching and learning undergraduate science and engineering. Focusing on the disciplines of astronomy, biology, chemistry, engineering, geosciences, and physics, this book is an introduction to strategies to try in your classroom or institution. Concrete examples and case studies illustrate how experienced instructors and leaders have applied evidence-based approaches to address student needs, encouraged the use of effective techniques within a department or an institution, and addressed the challenges that arose along the way. The research-based strategies in Reaching Students can be adopted or adapted by instructors and leaders in all types of public or private higher education institutions. They are designed to work in introductory and upper-level courses, small and large classes, lectures and labs, and courses for majors and non-majors. And these approaches are feasible for practitioners of all experience levels who are open to incorporating ideas from research and reflecting on their teaching practices. This book is an essential resource for enriching instruction and better educating students.
    What the experts say
    Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering contains a valuable message for those interested in refocusing instruction by experimenting with new ways to reach students. These approaches and strategies use research-based components for effective teaching and learning. Although written for a higher education audience, the examples and methodologies are applicable to adult education classes. With the interest in moving more adult learners on to postsecondary education and adult learner interest in STEM careers, it is important to help adult learners develop deeper conceptual and practical background in science. One major drawback is that the resource assumes that the instructor has the science knowledge needed to help students address misconceptions and areas of confusion.  This resource was not designed to directly develop adult educators’ science background, a need for many adult educators.  It does, however, answer another pressing concern:  helping adult learners prepare for high school equivalency tests.  The shift to student-centered strategies mirrors the most pressing concerns noted by groups, such as the GED Testing Service:  (1) pulling specific evidence from a written source to support a finding or conclusion; (2) expressing scientific information or findings in words; and (3) understand and apply scientific models, theories, and processes.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.
    Profile of Adult Learning Professionals in Correctional Criminal Justice System
    Author: European Induction Support for Adult learning Professionals to the Correctional Criminal Justice System (EISALP)
    Program Level: Professional Development
    Material Type: Collection
    Language: English
    License: (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) For license summary click here

    Abstract:

    This research is aimed towards the development of a European key competency profile for the adult learning professionals working in correctional criminal justice system, based on key competences for adult learning professionals, national researches in partner countries conducted on relevant stakeholders and European analysis of available materials on topic developed in other LLP initiatives.
    Publication Year
    2015
    This report profiles adult learning professionals (e.g. teachers, educators, social workers, psychologists) who work with adults in correctional settings. This report describes competency identification, competency modeling, and competency assessment needed for these success in these roles. Competency identification included compiling Romanian national available information about the duties, tasks, responsibilities, roles and work environments related to the job and identifying the relevant knowledge, skills and attitudes required by adult learning professionals in correctional criminal justice system. In the stage of competency modelling, the gathered data are used in the development of a consistent competence profile of adult learning professionals in correctional criminal justice system, while competency assessment refers to checking with stakeholders that the identified set of competences making up the profile is complete, consistent and real. The outcomes of the study was to identify the competencies needed. On pages 9-18, the report lists the competencies identified. Following that, the report provides recommendations around the potential uses for these competencies.
    What the experts say
    This is a tremendously helpful resource for educators and administrators across the globe. Even though the study originates from the European Union, the competencies identified in the profile and recommendations made are universally applicable and help, finally, to quantify the specific traits that enable an educator to succeed in classrooms behind bars. The profile presents an interesting take on how prison education professionals (including educators and others working in prison settings) can articulate the component pieces of their work, consider strengths and challenges and see how prison education both intersects with and is different to general adult education learning principles and practice around the world.
    Resource Notice
    This site includes links to information created by other public and private organizations. These links are provided for the user’s convenience. The U.S. Department of Education does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of this non-ED information. The inclusion of these links is not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse views expressed, or products or services offered, on these non-ED sites. Please note that privacy policies on non-ED sites may differ from ED’s privacy policy. When you visit lincs.ed.gov, no personal information is collected unless you choose to provide that information to us. We do not give, share, sell, or transfer any personal information to a third party. We recommend that you read the privacy policy of non-ED websites that you visit. We invite you to read our privacy policy.